Google’s Fresh Results: Irrelevancy In Action

Comments Off
http://www.xseo.com.au/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/digg_48.png http://www.xseo.com.au/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/reddit_48.png http://www.xseo.com.au/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/stumbleupon_48.png http://www.xseo.com.au/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/delicious_48.png http://www.xseo.com.au/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/google_48.png http://www.xseo.com.au/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/facebook_48.png http://www.xseo.com.au/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/sphinn_48.png http://www.xseo.com.au/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/twitter_48.png

Google continues to place a certain emphasis on the freshness of search results. Even with its latest monthly list of algorithm changes (which reminds me, another one should be coming out any day now), Google had five different changes related to freshness.

I’ve hinted at it several times while writing about Google, but I’ve never come out and written an article specifically about this. Google’s emphasis on freshness is often burying the more relevant results. While I run into this problem fairly often, I ran into it while I was working on my last article, so I decided to go ahead and point out an example of what I’m talking about.

WebProNews puts out a lot of content. I put out a fair amount myself, and sometimes I simply find it easiest to go to Google to search for past articles I know we’ve written, when I want to reference something we’ve talked about in the past. When I do this, I’ll usually search for “webpronews” and a few keywords I know are are relevant to the article I’m looking for. Sometimes Google will give me exactly what I need immediately. Sometimes, however, freshness is getting in the way, and this example proves that.

In this case, I was looking for the article I wrote back in August called “Does Google Need Twitter?” So I searched, “webpronews, does google need twitter”. I can’t imagine what else could be more relevant to that query than that article. According to Google (and this is with or without Search Plus Your World turned on, mind you), two more recent stories I wrote about the Penguin update (both from today) were more relevant to that search.

Fresh isn't always more relevant

The only mention of Twitter in either of the two articles ranking above the one I was actually looking for, comes in the author bio sections, where it says to follow me on Twitter. I’m not sure what signals Google was looking at to determine that these results would be relevant to me for that query, but clearly freshness was given too much weight.

This is just one example, of course, but I see this all the time.

Google may be looking to compensate for its lack of realtime Twitter data, which it lost as the result of a deal between the two companies expiring last year (in fact, that’s what “Does Google Need Twitter” was about).

We get it. Google can index new, fresh content. That’s good. I wouldn’t have it any other way. However, when Google had realtime search, it came in the form of a little box in the results, much like other universal search results appear – like when you get results from Google News. The latest tweet wasn’t presented as the top, most relevant result, just because it was indexed a minute ago.

Realtime search was Google’s best example of freshness, in my opinion, and that went away with the Twitter deal, although Google has hinted that it could return, with Google+ and other data. I don’t think it would work as well without Twitter though. But this is one important area of search where Google isn’t cutting it anymore. If you want the latest, up-to-the-second info or commentary on something, where are you going? Google or Twitter?

Interestingly enough, the fact that Twitter is better in this case, gives Google one line of defense against antitrust accusations. There is competition. In fact, verticals like this, with efforts from different companies (including Twitter) that have the potential to chip away at various pieces of Google dominance, may just be Google’s biggest weakness. I’ve had a conversation with one Googler, which leads me to believe the company tends to agree.

We saw how Google was falling short in the area of realtime search, in particular, when Muammar Gaddafi died.

Google continues to make changes to its algorithm every day, and a focus on quality, both with the Panda update and the Penguin update is good, even if these updates may not be entirely perfect. It’s also good to have content that’s as fresh as possible, so I also don’t want to say that Google’s focus on improving freshness is bad either, but I do feel that Google may be giving a little too much weight to this signal in its ranking process, just as it may be giving a little too much weight to social signals for some types of queries.

Either way, it clearly pays to keep putting out fresh content.

Image: The Fresh Prince Of Bel-Air (via)

May 1st 2012 Search, SEO

Talent Wars

Comments Off
http://www.xseo.com.au/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/digg_48.png http://www.xseo.com.au/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/reddit_48.png http://www.xseo.com.au/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/stumbleupon_48.png http://www.xseo.com.au/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/delicious_48.png http://www.xseo.com.au/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/google_48.png http://www.xseo.com.au/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/facebook_48.png http://www.xseo.com.au/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/sphinn_48.png http://www.xseo.com.au/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/twitter_48.png

Here we go again. The people problem, a perennial fear of agency bigwigs, has begun percolating again over the past year or so, starting in the way that many a digital snowball does: with a blog post.

“Prepare for Battle: The War on Digital Talent” screamed a mid-July headline from digital man-about-industry and Kraft vp of global digital and consumer engagement B. Bonin Bough. The post spawned a handful of news items and panel discussions, which led to still more blog posts, tweets, sharing and digital hand-wringing.

This is not the first time the ad business has squawked about attracting and retaining talent—but it may be the loudest. One reason is that digital media, where the competition for talent is most fierce, is becoming that much more integral to the ad business. Each year, digital ad spend slowly creeps closer to eclipsing its traditional counterpart, and campaigns are built faster and with technology that changes by the week—even TV and radio ads now incorporate digital elements.

At the Monaco Media Forum, Maurice Lévy, CEO of Publicis, declared, “We need to fight with the startups, technology and platform companies for talent, not the banks anymore.” (That the statement was cited by many as a bold, new proclamation may be evidence enough of the problem.)

Advertising needs digital talent, not the other way around. Up-and-coming technologists see Mark Zuckerberg, now a pop culture hero, netting $5 billion in Facebook’s IPO. They see New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg touting the vibrancy of the city’s entrepreneurial scene. They see their peers winning rounds of venture money with nothing but an idea. And those idea-stage companies with venture money are hiring, aggressively.

It’s become something of a joke at the New York Tech Meetup demos. Every five-minute presentation—delivered enthusiastically to a crowd of 700—ends with a less enthusiastic: “Oh, and, like everyone else, we’re hiring.” The founders deliver their offers hopelessly, knowing they’ll be lost in a desperate-sounding “Work for us!” chorus. Out of the 297 startups listed on New York Tech Meetup’s “Made in NY” site, 190 are actively hiring. The city’s hottest Internet companies can’t hire fast enough.

It’s no different out West, where the battle for talent even reaches down to the intern level. At both Google and Apple, recruiting is so intense that the companies, along with Adobe, Intel, Pixar, Lucasfilm and Intuit, conspired to form a “no-poach” gentlemen’s agreement. The move earned the group an antitrust lawsuit.

But on Madison Avenue, plenty of top-tier digital agencies have 30—some as many as 60—open positions they’re scrambling to fill. With so much competition for the same talent, agencies need a fresh appeal. Essentially, agencies need to become cool again.

Digital advertising jobs would seem to be cool, given that’s where the innovation is happening in the industry. But digital is also still fighting the media establishment, where change is slow. Thanks to the disconnect between time spent and ad dollars spent, it would be easy to argue that the ad industry remains in denial about the Internet. Every doomsday prediction about the demise of old media can today be shot down with a simple point to the scoreboard.

TV advertising, a $68 billion business, certainly isn’t going away. Yet it grew by just 2.4 percent last year. Compare that with the 22 percent uptick of digital ad spend, which some projections have topping that of TV by 2016. Even static TV spots are becoming more digital as second-screen experiences on mobile, tablets and desktops integrate brands. One-third of this year’s Super Bowl ads used Shazam’s sound-recognition technology to digitally connect with viewers. Those deals were not the TV team’s ideas. Likewise, radio advertising, a $16 billion business, isn’t disappearing yet is becoming more digital as streaming services like Pandora and Spotify make aggressive bids for consumers and advertising budgets.

“Every industry debates whether the Internet will disrupt their business,” says Aaron Shapiro, CEO of digital agency Huge. “In the beginning, everyone says, ‘No, no—our business is safe.’ But it’s only a matter of time before digital disrupts every industry that exists in our economy.”

Traditional agencies see the writing on the wall, even as they adjust for a leaner 2012 and execute layoffs—and it comes as no surprise the positions they’re cutting are not digital. When 58 staffers at Ogilvy & Mather and OgilvyOne were given walking papers in January, the cuts affected those employees lacking digital and mobile marketing skills, sources tell Adweek. A few weeks later, Crispin Porter + Bogusky terminated 43 of its 900 staffers, a move CEO Andrew Keller says reflects the firm’s adjustment to changing economics. CP+B must be “leaner and more flexible than ever,” he pointed out at the time.

“There’s no question the inability to hire is holding back growth at the agencies,” says Alan Cutter, CEO and founder of AC Lion, a recruiting agency. “They say all the time, ‘Money is not an issue. New business is not an issue. We need people.’”

For example, last year the agency Huge doubled in size, Shapiro points out, but it could have grown much faster had the firm been able to staff up in tandem. The 450-person shop now has around 50 open positions. AKQA, now up to 1,200 employees, has 60 to 90 open positions, often multiples of the same job, says Jennifer Remling, the agency’s director of global recruiting. AKQA awards any employee who refers a new hire with a cash bonus and a luxury trip.

Unicorn Hunting
Huge received 26,000 resumes last year—more than 80 per day—yet still couldn’t fill 50 jobs. There’s a disconnect between applicants and openings, and the problem is somewhat existential. Agencies seek hybrid workers who can write code as well as write copy. They want graphic designers who are also information architects—and they want them with a few years of experience. True creative technologists, with superior technical and creative talents, are so rare that one recruiter likens them to unicorns. (Still another calls them “five-headed monsters.”) Attracting digital talent is difficult enough—attracting highly sought-after, experienced talent exacerbates the problem.

Wieden + Kennedy’s senior management recognizes that its ideal candidates—“the Leonardo da Vincis, the Renaissance men and women who can create genuine art and technology”—are few and far between, says Igor Clark, the agency’s creative technology director. Wieden + Kennedy often hires these so-called da Vincis—many of them talented and ambitious enough to start their own businesses—as part-time consultants so it can benefit from their ideas and expertise.

The strategy often pays off. Consider James Gross and Noah Brier, formerly of The Barbarian Group, who last year launched Percolate, a recommendation engine for brands. Or Adam Leibsohn, who left Anomaly last year to start Voyurl, a browser plugin that helps Web surfers profit from their personal data. Then there’s Millie Sensat, a creative director who left Organic to co-found Clothia, a fashion startup. Even Richard Exon, CEO of Rainey Kelly Campbell Roalfe/Y&R, and his creative director Damon Collins abandoned their company last fall to launch a still-to-be-named startup.

Turnover at agencies is as high as 30 percent on top accounts, according to Matt Straz, founder and CEO of Namely. “There’s only one other industry that has that high of a turnover rate, and that’s the hospitality industry,” he says.

Straz spent a decade at MEC before leaving to start his own company, which has built a dashboard for agencies to “check the vital signs” of their workforce, he says. Put more bluntly, Namely susses out those who are thinking of leaving their jobs and assists agencies in trying to change their minds.

The industry is also getting more aggressive, with the American Association of Advertising Agencies last month rolling out a website aimed at enhancing advertising’s image among young people. But creative technologists, product designers and coders the industry is attempting to woo aren’t impressed by large organizations where process, hierarchy, bureaucracy and—most egregious of all—cubicles—are the order of the day, says Shirley Engelmeier, CEO of recruiting firm InclusionINC.

It’s the dreaded millennial theme: members of that generation want their voices heard from day one, they want to grow quickly within the organization and they want responsibility. They want to stay late, and they want to be allowed to experiment. “They are intensely passionate if they are allowed to be included,” Engelmeier says.

Be a Startup
Some contend that the agencies best positioned to attract and keep talent are those that act like startups. Agencies certainly are prone to tout the versatility of their work—you’ll work on something different every month, they often come promising. But at a big agency, the waterfall structure often requires that tasks be broken down to a menial level. They often are less collaborative, opinions go unsolicited and sometimes clients will nix entire projects after months of work, as any agency insider knows.

That’s why Andrew Mercando, product designer at R/GA, decided to cross over to a tech company. Mercando says he noticed the range of projects his sister worked on as head of product development at Hunch, a startup that last year was sold to eBay. While he worked exclusively on wire frames, his sister was designing a mobile app, creating visual treatments and building things, all the while collaborating with the engineers and making her voice heard. Last fall, he joined Skillshare, a community workshop startup.

It’s a common tale. “In the agency world, you might be a media buyer or supervisor, and you’re just a cog in the wheel,” observes AC Lion’s Cutter. “At a startup, you have access to the CEO and have a say in developing strategy.”

Agencies can’t recreate that kind of “your opinion matters” experience for each employee, naturally—they have big accounts, deadlines and shareholders to worry about, after all. But within the agency, they can recreate a flexible startup-like experience that appeals to employees most at risk for flight.

The best example may be Google’s “20 percent time” perk, which grants employees one day each week to work on a pet project outside their job descriptions. Agencies increasingly are copying the model with internal labs and skunkworks programs, encouraging innovation for the sake of innovation.

Sometimes, there are pitfalls. Take the labs arm of BBH, a 928-person agency with billings of more than $1.5 billion, which garnered national attention in March—much of it negative—for its guerrilla “Homeless Hotspots” project at South by Southwest. Meanwhile, Made by Many, a London creative agency with 31 employees, built an Instagram-like app called Picle as a side project; in just one month, 50,000 people downloaded it.

The natural extension of a labs program is the in-agency incubator. For the purposes of staying up on technology or grabbing a potential client’s attention, agencies like W+K, Rockfish Interactive and Ignited have invested in their own incubators. The result is a crop of in-house startups, with the added bonus of a startup-style infusion of nimbleness, experimentation and innovation.

Peer-influencer platform Crowdtap began inside Brooklyn creative agency Mr Youth. Now it is a stand-alone business with $10 million in VC backing, including contributions from Mr Youth. W+K’s cloud computing cost-assessment company Cloudability launched last year, as did Urban Airship, the agency’s mobile app push notifier. Rockfish has graduated 10 startups from its labs division, including CouponFactory and TidyTweet.

The agency incubator can be a powerful recruiting tool. Not only do employees get to work on fun pet projects, but they can aspire to one day spin their projects out of the agency—and find themselves at startups after all. Agencies get exposure to useful innovation, as well as street cred among techies.

Agencies less keen on in-house entrepreneurship have focused their efforts on in-house training.

AKQA’s internship program features training that is so robust the agency ends up hiring 80 percent of its interns. The firm hosts an annual student ad campaign in collaboration with Cannes, called Future Lions, which became a source of new hires for the firm, as well as Droga5, W+K and Crispin Porter + Bogusky.

Once they’re in, it’s important to let young, passionate employees know where they could be in five years and how they’ll get there, especially since turnover is greatest at the two-to-three-year mark, according to Cutter. “Agencies have more career development resources than startups—they have the ability to pay for an MBA,” he says.

For agencies to keep talent, it comes down to a concept they already are intimately familiar with: engagement. Agencies already make it a priority for their clients, as Engelmeier points out. If they want to win the talent wars, they’ll have to start doing it for themselves as well.



April 30th 2012 Search, Technology, Twitter

Google Penguin Update: 12 Tips Directly From Google

Comments Off
http://www.xseo.com.au/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/digg_48.png http://www.xseo.com.au/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/reddit_48.png http://www.xseo.com.au/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/stumbleupon_48.png http://www.xseo.com.au/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/delicious_48.png http://www.xseo.com.au/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/google_48.png http://www.xseo.com.au/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/facebook_48.png http://www.xseo.com.au/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/sphinn_48.png http://www.xseo.com.au/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/twitter_48.png

In case you haven’t heard the news, the official name for the Webspam update Google launched this week, is reportedly the Penguin update. Google’s Matt Cutts even tweeted a picture of a stuffed Panda hanging out with a stuffed Penguin. How cute.

Now, we don’t know exactly what all Google takes into account with this Penguin update. But Google made it pretty clear that it’s about targeting those violating its quality guidelines. Here’s an exact quote from the announcement:

In the next few days, we’re launching an important algorithm change targeted at webspam. The change will decrease rankings for sites that we believe are violating Google’s existing quality guidelines.

There wasn’t this much apparent clarity with the Panda update. There was (and frankly, still is) a lot of speculation about how to survive Panda. Google did release a list of questions that webmasters should ask themselves related to how Google assesses quality, but it wasn’t completely black and white.

Luckily, Google lists exactly what the quality guidelines are. In other words, Google tells you exactly what not to do.

There are 8 “specific guidelines”. They are (verbatim):

1. Avoid hidden text or hidden links.

2. Don’t use cloaking or sneaky redirects.

3. Don’t send automated queries to Google.

4. Don’t load pages with irrelevant keywords.

5. Don’t create multiple pages, subdomains, or domains with substantially duplicate content.

6. Don’t create pages with malicious behavior, such as phishing or installing viruses, trojans, or other badware.

7. Avoid “doorway” pages created just for search engines, or other “cookie cutter” approaches such as affiliate programs with little or no original content.

8. If your site participates in an affiliate program, make sure that your site adds value. Provide unique and relevant content that gives users a reason to visit your site first.

Some of them are more black and white than others. For example, avoiding hidden text or hidden links seems like a pretty obvious thing. Just don’t do it. The duplicate content one is a little different. What does Google consider “substantially duplicate content”? How much is too much?

Beyond the specific guidelines, Google also lists 4 “basic principles”. These are:

1. Make pages primarily for users, not for search engines. Don’t deceive your users or present different content to search engines than you display to users, which is commonly referred to as “cloaking.”

2. Avoid tricks intended to improve search engine rankings. A good rule of thumb is whether you’d feel comfortable explaining what you’ve done to a website that competes with you. Another useful test is to ask, “Does this help my users? Would I do this if search engines didn’t exist?”

3. Don’t participate in link schemes designed to increase your site’s ranking or PageRank. In particular, avoid links to web spammers or “bad neighborhoods” on the web, as your own ranking may be affected adversely by those links.

4. Don’t use unauthorized computer programs to submit pages, check rankings, etc. Such programs consume computing resources and violate our Terms of Service. Google does not recommend the use of products such as WebPosition Gold™ that send automatic or programmatic queries to Google.

Google provides plenty more guidelines and elaboration on the quality guidelines in its help center.

Of course, none of this is new. It’s just that now Google has a better way to enforce them (or at least, it hopes it does).

More on Penguin/Webspam Update:

Google Penguin Update: The New Name For The WebSpam Update
Webspam And Panda Updates: Does SEO Still Matter? 
Google Webspam Algorithm Update Draws Mixed Reviews From Users 
Google Webspam Update: Where’s The Viagra? [Updated] 
Google Webspam Update: “Make Money Online” Query Yields Less Than Quality Result 
Google Webspam Update: Losers & Winners, According To Searchmetrics [Updated] 
How Much Of Google’s Webspam Efforts Come From These Patents? 
Google Panda Update: Data Refresh Hit Last Week

Image: Batman Returns from Warner Bros.

April 28th 2012 Google, Search

Webspam And Panda Updates: Does SEO Still Matter?

Comments Off
http://www.xseo.com.au/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/digg_48.png http://www.xseo.com.au/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/reddit_48.png http://www.xseo.com.au/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/stumbleupon_48.png http://www.xseo.com.au/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/delicious_48.png http://www.xseo.com.au/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/google_48.png http://www.xseo.com.au/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/facebook_48.png http://www.xseo.com.au/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/sphinn_48.png http://www.xseo.com.au/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/twitter_48.png

It’s been a crazy week in search. While not entirely unexpected, Google launched its new Webspam update (which should still be in the process of rolling out, as Google said it would take a few days). This update, according to the company, is aimed at black hat SEO tactics and the sites engaging in them, to keep them from ranking over content that is just better and more relevant. While most that don’t engage in such tactics would agree that this would be a good thing, a lot of people are complaining about the effects of the update on the user experience, and on results in general.

Do you think Google’s results have improved or gotten worse with this update? Let us know in the comments.

The Webspam update, as it’s officially been dubbed by Google’s Matt Cutts, is really only part of the equation though. Cutts also revealed that Google launched a data refresh of the Panda update around April 19th. So it would appear that a mixture of these two updates (along with whatever other tweaks Google may have made) have caused a lot of chaos among webmasters and in some search results.

What The Panda Update Is About

I’m not going to spend a lot of time talking about Panda here. I feel I’ve done that enough for the past year. If you’re not familiar with Panda, I’d suggest reading through our coverage here. Essentially, it’s Google’s attempt to make quality content rise to the top. There are a lot of variables, opinions and speculation throughout the Panda saga, but in a nutshell, it’s just about Google wanting good, quality content ranking well.

What The Webspam Update Is About

Interestingly enough, the Webspam update is about quality content as well. In fact, Google’s announcement of the update was titled: Another Step To Reward High-Quality Sites. It can be viewed as a complement to Panda. A way for Google to keep spammy crap from interfering with the high quality content the Panda update was designed to promote. That is, in a perfect world. But when has this world ever been perfect? When has Google ever been perfect?

When Matt Cutts first talked about this update, before it had a name or people even really knew what to expect, he said Google was going after “over-optimization”. He said, at SXSW last month, “The idea is basically to try and level the playing ground a little bit, so all those people who have sort of been doing, for lack of a better word, ‘over-optimization’ or overly doing their SEO, compared to the people who are just making great content and trying to make a fantastic site, we want to sort of make that playing field a little more level.”

At the time, we wrote an article about it, talking about how Google was working on making SEO matter less. This week, Cutts aimed to clarify this a bit. Danny Sullivan quotes Cutts as saying, “I think ‘over-optimization’ wasn’t the best description, because it blurred the distinction between white hat SEO and webspam. This change is targeted at webspam, not SEO, and we tried to make that fact more clear in the blog post.”

Well, it’s clear that black hat webpsam is a target, because the post says those exact words. “The opposite of ‘white hat’ SEO is something called “black hat webspam” (we say ‘webspam’ to distinguish it from email spam),” Cutts says in the post, later adding, “In the next few days, we’re launching an important algorithm change targeted at webspam. The change will decrease rankings for sites that we believe are violating Google’s existing quality guidelines. We’ve always targeted webspam in our rankings, and this algorithm represents another improvement in our efforts to reduce webspam and promote high quality content. ”

OK, so as long as you abide by Google’s quality guidelines, this update should not impact you negatively right?

The part that isn’t quite as clear is about how much SEO tactics really matter. While he have clarified that that they’re more concerned about getting rid of the black hat stuff, he also said something in that post, which would seem to indicate that Google wants content from sites not worried about SEO at all to rank better too (when it’s good of course).

“We want people doing white hat search engine optimization (or even no search engine optimization at all) to be free to focus on creating amazing, compelling web sites,” says Cutts. Emphasis added.

To me, that says that Google is not against white hat SEO (obviously – Google promotes plenty of white hat tactics), but they also would like to have it matter less.

While I’m sure many in the SEO industry would disagree (because it could cost them their businesses), wouldn’t it ultimately be better for users and webmasters alike if they didn’t have to worry about SEO at all? If Google could just determine what the best results really were?

Don’t worry, SEOs. We don’t live in that fantasy land yet, and while Google (and its competitors) would love to be able to do this, there is little evidence to suggest that will happen in the foreseeable future. In fact, I’d expect the nature of how we consume information from the web to evolve so much by that point, that it may not even be a relevant discussion.

But rather than talk about what the future may bring (though Google’s certainly thinking about it), let’s focus on the here and now.

Who Has Felt The Effects Of Google’s Updates?

You can browse any number of forum threads and blog comments and see plenty of personal stories about sites getting hit. Searchmetrics, as it usually does following major Google updates, compiled some preliminary lists of the top winners and losers. Before we get to those lists, however, there are some caveats. For one, the firm was clear that these are preview lists. Secondly, the update has probably not finished rolling out yet. Third, they were put out before the Panda refresh was made public, and Matt Cutts says the list isn’t indicative of the sites impacted by the Webspam update.”

He told Sullivan, “There’s a pretty big flaw with this “winner/loser” data. Searchmetrics says that they’re comparing by looking at rankings from a week ago. We rolled out a Panda data refresh several days ago. Because of the one week window, the Searchmetrics data include not only drops because of the webspam algorithm update but also Panda-related drops. In fact, when our engineers looked at Searchmetrics’ list of 50 sites that dropped, we only saw 2-3 sites that were affected in any way by the webspam algorithm update. I wouldn’t take the Searchmetrics list as indicative of the sites that were affected by the webspam algorithm update.”

OK, so the lists apparently more indicative of the lastest Panda victims and winners. We still don’t really know who the biggest losers and winners on the Webpspam front are. Perhaps Searchmetrics will release another lists soon, with this new information taken into account.

Here are the lists:

Searchmetrics list

Searchmetrics list

Note that Demand Media’s eHow.com is not on the list. If you’ve followed the Panda saga all the way, you’ll know that it has always been in the conversation. Thought of as a content farm, it was the kind of site many thought Panda was designed to target. While it managed to escape unscathed for a while, Panda eventually caught up with it, and Demand Media made a lot of changes, which seem to have helped tremendously. They deleted a lot of articles and implemented some other things designed to keep quality up.

During the company’s most recent earnings call (there’s another one coming in May), Demand Media said it hadn’t been affected by a Google update since July. It will be interesting to see what they say on the next call.

There is some speculation that eHow may have benefited from recent Google updates, whether Panda or Webspam. Here’s a tweet from WebmasterWorld/PubCon Founder Brett Tabke:

Did ‘ehow’ just make a comeback in the serps? hmmm – ran into them in 4 searches in last hour. 1 hour ago via web ·  Reply ·  Retweet ·  Favorite · powered by @socialditto

We asked Demand Media if they’ve seen any increase in Google referrals. The company won’t comment because they’re in a quiet period ahead of their results announcement.

Are Google Results Better?

There is never a shortage of criticism of Google’s search results, yet it has managed to steadily dominate the market, so clearly they’ve remained good enough not to alienate the majority of users. There do, however, seem to be some very identifiable flaws in some search results right now.

For example, there is all kinds of weird stuff going on with the SERP for “viagra”. For example, viagra.com, the official site, was not on the first page, when it should have been the first result. Just as I was writing this piece, viagra.com reappeared at number one. More on the other viagra page issues (some of which are still there) here.

For the query, “make money online,” the top result was a page without any content on it whatsoever. Not what Google had in mind in terms of quality, I assume. Looking now, it actually appears Google has fixed this one too.

A couple things we’ve seen mentioned by webmasters repeatedly, with regards to what has gotten sites’ Google rankings hit, are exact match domains and sites with a lot of links from spun content sources. Of course not every exact match domain is hit, but it could be a factor for some topics that do tend to generate a lot of spam. Viagra would certainly fit that bill, and may have just been an innocent casualty, which Google had to correct. I wonder how many more of those there are, and if Google will correct them.

From what Google says, it’s more about things like keyword stuffing, link schemes and other things that violate its quality guidelines. You may want to go read those carefully.

Update: Apparently, the Webspam update is now called the Penguin update, even though Cutts already called it the Webspam update. Sigh. I guess I have some re-tagging to do.

What do you think? Did Google get its Webspam update right? As Panda continues to march on, is that making results better? Share your thoughts in the comments.

April 28th 2012 Search, SEO

Alleged Copyright Infringers Could Be Outted By ISPs, EU Court Rules

Comments Off
http://www.xseo.com.au/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/digg_48.png http://www.xseo.com.au/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/reddit_48.png http://www.xseo.com.au/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/stumbleupon_48.png http://www.xseo.com.au/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/delicious_48.png http://www.xseo.com.au/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/google_48.png http://www.xseo.com.au/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/facebook_48.png http://www.xseo.com.au/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/sphinn_48.png http://www.xseo.com.au/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/twitter_48.png

Earlier this month, a District Court in California ruled against a copyright holder who had wished to obtain the identity of a number of BitTorrent users by subpoenaing the ISP identified with the piracy. The copyright holder, Hard Drive Productions, wanted the IP addresses of the users who participated in the illegal file-sharing but didn’t wish to pursue the matter in court. Wisely, the District Court judge sense that Hard Drive essentially wanted the court to do the dirty work for them but not actually employ the court system to prosecute the accused copyright violators and therefore ruled that the ISPs didn’t have to reveal the identity of the alleged copyright violators.

Across the Atlantic, a similar case in which copyright holders have demanded the identity of an alleged pirate be forfeited by a Swedish ISP wherein the European Court of Justice has decided that, yes, the ISP could be required to hand over the IP “which was allegedly used in an infringement.” This doesn’t mean that the ISP must now hand it over, per se, but rather that the case will return to Sweden’s Supreme Court in order to determine if the IP address will indeed have to be shared with the copyright holders.

While this case is a suit to obtain the identity of one person who stored 2,000 audio books on his server whereas the California case was about ninety BitTorrent users, the same concerns cited by Judge Howard R. Lloyd in the BitTorrent case still persist, namely that the process of identifying the user via IP address is no guarantee of identifying the culpable person.

Since the EU case is focused on only one user, it creates a dilemma between how courts should arbitrate when an ISP handing over IP addresses associated with illegal file-sharing. If it’s one, the thinking seems to be that the risk of misidentifying the copyright infringer is low; but if multiple identities are being requested, however, the risk of misidentifying copyright infringers goes up.

Granted, these courts from country to country aren’t expected to rule in accordance.

April 25th 2012 Search

Robert Doisneau: 100th Birthday Celebrated With Google Doodle

Comments Off
http://www.xseo.com.au/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/digg_48.png http://www.xseo.com.au/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/reddit_48.png http://www.xseo.com.au/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/stumbleupon_48.png http://www.xseo.com.au/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/delicious_48.png http://www.xseo.com.au/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/google_48.png http://www.xseo.com.au/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/facebook_48.png http://www.xseo.com.au/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/sphinn_48.png http://www.xseo.com.au/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/twitter_48.png

French photographer Robert Doisneau created some of the most iconic images in modern art, bringing his trusty camera with him around the cobblestoned-streets of Paris to capture those rare moments in time that can’t be recreated.

“The marvels of daily life are so exciting; no movie director can arrange the unexpected that you find in the street,” he once said.

He became known for his images of children at play on the streets and sidewalks, giving grace and a playful dignity to the culture of youth. One of his most well-known photos, Trois petits enfants blancs, parc Monceau (“Three Little White Children, Parc Monceau”) depicts three youngsters at play near a monument to writer Guy de Maupassant and is featured in today’s Google Doodle.

Any photographer will tell you that it takes a great amount of patience to be successful at capturing the perfect image; Doisneau sometimes even staged a scene in order to get the right amount of emotion into the image, as was the case with perhaps his most famous photograph, “Kiss by the Hotel de Ville”. The picture appeared in a 1950 issue of Life magazine and caused a lawsuit after a French couple mistakenly thought the image was of them and sued over rights to their likeness. However, Doisneau revealed that it was a different pair of lovers he’d photographed, which he was sure of because he’d asked them to recreate the kiss after failing to capture it the first time on film.

robert doisneau photo

Doisneau created a lovely tapestry of black-and-white history, making him an iconic artist whose work will be admired for years to come.

April 15th 2012 Search

Learning independence with Google Search features

Comments Off
http://www.xseo.com.au/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/digg_48.png http://www.xseo.com.au/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/reddit_48.png http://www.xseo.com.au/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/stumbleupon_48.png http://www.xseo.com.au/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/delicious_48.png http://www.xseo.com.au/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/google_48.png http://www.xseo.com.au/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/facebook_48.png http://www.xseo.com.au/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/sphinn_48.png http://www.xseo.com.au/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/twitter_48.png

Searches can become stories. Some are inspiring, some change the way we see the world and some just put a smile on our face. This is a story of how people can use Google to do something extraordinary. If you have a story, share it. – Ed.

We all have memories of the great teachers who shaped our childhood. They found ways to make the lightbulb go off in our heads, instilled in us a passion for learning and helped us realize our potential. The very best teachers were creative with the tools at their disposal, whether it was teaching the fundamentals of addition with Cheerios or the properties of carbon dioxide with baking soda and vinegar. As the Internet has developed, so too have the resources available for teachers to educate their students.

One teacher who has taken advantage of the web as an educational tool is Cheryl Oakes, a resource room teacher in Wells, Maine. She’s also been able to tailor the vast resources available on the web to each student’s ability. This approach has proven invaluable for Cheryl’s students, in particular 16-year-old Morgan, whose learning disability makes it daunting to sort through search results to find those webpages that she can comfortably read. Cheryl taught Morgan how to use the Search by Reading Level feature on Google Search, which enables Morgan to focus only on those results that are most understandable to her. To address the difficulty Morgan faces with typing, Cheryl introduced her to Voice Search, so Morgan can speak her queries into the computer. Morgan is succeeding in high school, and just registered to take her first college course this summer.

There’s a practically limitless amount of information available on the web, and with search features, you can find the content that is most meaningful for you. For more information, visit google.com/insidesearch/features.html.

March 30th 2012 Search

FCC Targets Botnets With New Anti-Bot Code Of Conduct

Comments Off
http://www.xseo.com.au/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/digg_48.png http://www.xseo.com.au/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/reddit_48.png http://www.xseo.com.au/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/stumbleupon_48.png http://www.xseo.com.au/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/delicious_48.png http://www.xseo.com.au/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/google_48.png http://www.xseo.com.au/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/facebook_48.png http://www.xseo.com.au/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/sphinn_48.png http://www.xseo.com.au/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/twitter_48.png

With one of every ten computers in the United States infected by bots, botnets have officially become enough of a menace/threat/foe to the U.S. government that its launching an initiative to reduce their number.

Announced earlier today, The Online Trust Alliance joined a unanimous vote at the Federal Communications Commission’s council for communications security, approving the voluntary U.S. Anti-Bot Code of Conduct for Internet Service Providers. You ready for this? The shorthand version of the bill is known as “the ABCs for ISPs.” Cute, isn’t it?

As a member of the council appointed by FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski, the OTA has been working with the FCC and leading ISPs to develop this voluntary Code in order to help protect the infrastructure of the country’s communications as well as consumer data. Bots, as you may or may not know, can be deployed to do anything from send out spam to eavesdrop on network traffic to swiping passwords from users.

“Today is an example of the importance of self-regulatory efforts to help improve the safety and performance of the internet,” said Craig Spiezle, executive director and President of the Online Trust Alliance. “Sustainable solutions to contain bots must include all stakeholders in efforts to detect, prevent, and remediate these threats.”

Chairman Genachowski added, “The recommendations approved today identify smart, practical, voluntary solutions that will materially improve the cyber security of commercial networks and bolster the broader endeavors of our federal partners.”

The development of the ABCs for ISPs was developed over the past 12 months with the participation of trade associations and companies, including OTA members PayPal, Microsoft, Symantec, and Internet Identity, and leading ISPs, including Comcast and CenturyLink. Approximately 29% (or 23 million) of all U.S. households that have broadband service will gain added protection from ISPs who have adopted the Anti-Bot Code of Conduct. Focusing on residential users, the Code includes five areas of focus for ISPs: education, detection, notification, remediation, and collaboration (EDNRC? Doesn’t quite follow in line with the previous acronyms).

To participate in the Code, ISPs will be required to complete at least one activity in each of those five areas:

  • Education – an activity intended to help increase end-user education and awareness of botnet issues and how to help prevent bot infections;
  • Detection – an activity intended to identify botnet activity in the ISP’s network, obtain information on botnet activity in the ISP’s network, or enable end-users to self-determine potential bot infections on their end-user devices;
  • Notification – an activity intended to notify customers of suspected bot infections or enable customers to determine if they may be infected by a bot;
  • Remediation – an activity intended to provide information to end-users about how they can remediate bot infections, or to assist end-users in remediating bot infections;
  • Collaboration – an activity to share with other ISPs feedback and experience learned from the participating ISP’s Code activities.
  • Future OTA reports will track adoption, highlighting those ISPs who have asserted their implementation of the Code. As independent organizations committed to enhancing online trust and confidence, ISPs are encouraged to report to OTA. Future reports will include the adoption of similar efforts by other stakeholders and industry segments. Additional information and the link to the Code are posted at https://otalliance.org/botnets.html.

    March 23rd 2012 Search

    Google Maps Adds Street View To Poland; Adds Warsaw, Cracow

    Comments Off
    http://www.xseo.com.au/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/digg_48.png http://www.xseo.com.au/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/reddit_48.png http://www.xseo.com.au/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/stumbleupon_48.png http://www.xseo.com.au/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/delicious_48.png http://www.xseo.com.au/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/google_48.png http://www.xseo.com.au/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/facebook_48.png http://www.xseo.com.au/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/sphinn_48.png http://www.xseo.com.au/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/twitter_48.png

    As a boon for travelers, you cannot deny that Google Maps has become a great companion for preparing for trips. They’ve made a habit of waving their Street View wand at parts of the world expecting loads of tourists and ensure that the city (or country) in question has a reliable street-level map. The latest country to get that top-notch preparation Poland, which will host the 2012 European Football Championship later this year.

    According to an update on the Lat Long Blog, Poland’s largest and second-largest cities, Warsaw and Poland, respectively, got the Street View treatment and now boast beautiful street-level panoramas. Google has good foreknowledge of weather conditions as both of the cities have photos showing off their best offerings on some spectacular days. In the Warsaw Street View, here’s a visit over to the Presidential Palace. Oddly, while the city is the 10th most populous city in Europe, there really doesn’t seem to be anybody interested in checking out the Palace.


    View Larger Map

    Over in Cracow, one guy was really excited about spotting the Google Street View car (or else he’s just generally excited about being in Cracow, but I can’t say I wouldn’t feel the same way).


    View Larger Map

    One fun bit of eye trivia you’ll find is in front of St. Mary’s Basilica in Main Market Square. Rather than ask why there is some sad looking clown hanging around in front of the cathedral, I prefer to ask, “Why not?”


    View Larger Map

    March 23rd 2012 Search

    eBay Sells Rent.com To Primedia

    Comments Off
    http://www.xseo.com.au/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/digg_48.png http://www.xseo.com.au/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/reddit_48.png http://www.xseo.com.au/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/stumbleupon_48.png http://www.xseo.com.au/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/delicious_48.png http://www.xseo.com.au/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/google_48.png http://www.xseo.com.au/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/facebook_48.png http://www.xseo.com.au/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/sphinn_48.png http://www.xseo.com.au/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/twitter_48.png

    eBay has sold Rent.com to Primedia, which also owns ApartmentGuide.com, Rentals.com, RentalHouses.com and NewHomeGuide.com. The property search site should fit right in.

    eBay says Rent.com had “limited synergies” with its core business, and that the company is “focusing on enabling commerce for buyers and sellers globally through platforms and technology.

    You might recall a couple of recent, and pretty major PayPal announcements in PayPal Here and PayPal Digital Wallet. I’m assuming it’s things like this eBay is referencing.

    “Rent.com has a strong reputation, brand awareness, history and URL,” Primedia CEO Charles Stubbs said. “Both Rent.com and PRIMEDIA have long track records of delivering a high-quality consumer and client experience in the marketplace.”

    “We are excited to be joining PRIMEDIA, a leading vertical search company in the apartment and rental housing sector,” said Rent.com GM Bill McKnight. “Rent.com fits in nicely with PRIMEDIA’s mission of being the go-to resource to help people find the perfect place to live.”

    Terms of the deal weren’t disclosed.

    March 23rd 2012 Search